|
|
Post by codename on Nov 9, 2010 21:53:16 GMT 1
yes other photographers since the pictures of one can be better/worser then the other guy, or a few booths with a gopher who allows people to take pics of them selfs (friends take them or something)
the one of the past 2 years was kinda not appropriate in some people's eyes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stoney3K on Nov 12, 2010 14:08:55 GMT 1
yes other photographers since the pictures of one can be better/worser then the other guy, or a few booths with a gopher who allows people to take pics of them selfs (friends take them or something) the one of the past 2 years was kinda not appropriate in some people's eyes. I think that will only work with photo shoots of the cosplayers and visitors. The "official" photo shoots are negotiated with the actors, their agents, and the photographer in question, and it would not be appropriate for a 'competing' photographer to offer the same service (for a profit) |
|
|
|
Post by codename on Nov 16, 2010 21:06:09 GMT 1
yes other photographers since the pictures of one can be better/worser then the other guy, or a few booths with a gopher who allows people to take pics of them selfs (friends take them or something) the one of the past 2 years was kinda not appropriate in some people's eyes. I think that will only work with photo shoots of the cosplayers and visitors. The "official" photo shoots are negotiated with the actors, their agents, and the photographer in question, and it would not be appropriate for a 'competing' photographer to offer the same service (for a profit) i get your point of vieuw, but as sad as it can be not all people can get along, that goes for photographers, you're fudged if you want a picture with a actor and the dude or dudette refuses to photograph you. not exactly professional or even mature. but i was more reffering to the "non-actors" shoots |
|
|
|
Post by boomvavavoom on Nov 16, 2010 22:44:30 GMT 1
maybe I am not reading this clearly but what exactly is the problem/discussion here?
|
|
|
|
Post by cartoonjessie on Nov 17, 2010 13:23:07 GMT 1
If you buy a ticket, the photographer can not refuse you.
So I do not see the problem either.
|
|
|
|
Post by codename on Nov 17, 2010 18:50:55 GMT 1
it's not first hand but a friend of mine who came over for his first time facts got refused, he wasnt told a reason or anything i have a hunch but i dont like pointing fingers because myself has been refused and even been threated -non-professional
|
|
|
|
Post by boomvavavoom on Nov 18, 2010 11:04:00 GMT 1
I still have no clue as to what the problem is exactly.
|
|
|
|
Post by cartoonjessie on Nov 18, 2010 11:23:58 GMT 1
Was it for a picture with the actors? Or what? Could you be more specific?
|
|
Myka
FACTS Sensei
Posts: 214
|
Post by Myka on Nov 29, 2010 9:21:04 GMT 1
It seems that this troubles you immensely, even if i don't get the problem either.
So a piece of advice would be: Try asking for a reason next time?
Not all photographers are obliged to photograph you. Professional or not. There also might have been a problem, lack of time, other intensions to be at F.A.C.T.S, etc.
Photo's of or with an actor can be arranged if you buy a ticket or wait in line. (If i'm not mistaken, this isn't my alley of expertise)
And there are a lot of professional photographers walking/standing around at F.A.C.T.S. Of the top of my hat i'll give you a few: Nakama-focus, N8e.be, Aztek-Tv, Kmeron and many many more.
I guess it's just a matter of asking another person to take a picture of you or just take a camera with you and team up with friends to make pictures.
|
|
